Facial Rejuvenation

Global Injections

Full-face rejuvenation with injectables offers high patient satisfaction, but requires advanced training and an awareness of risk factors.
MedEsthetics July/August 2018

When medical aesthetic practices first began to use the term “Liquid Facelift” to describe the use of fillers and botulinum toxins for facial rejuvenation, there was some discomfort in the industry. Many practitioners were wary of suggesting that patients could achieve results comparable to a facelift nonsurgically, and the outcomes were not always ideal. But with experience, new indications and improved techniques, outcomes have improved significantly.

A Single Entry Injection Method for Facial Volume Replacement

Soft tissue fillers are popular and effective tools for replacing lost volume in the face. The most common adverse event is bruising, particularly in patients who require injections to multiple areas. In an effort to reduce filler-related bruising, Hasan Galadari, MD, and Wolfgang Redka-Swoboda, MD, have developed a technique that allows practitioners to fill the cheek and tear trough through a single entry point injection site.

Newsmakers: Hydrating Fillers

Microdroplet injections of low-viscosity hyaluronic acid-based fillers are gaining fans around the globe.
The use of dermal fillers for hydration is making its way to the U.S.

Hydrating fillers—low-viscosity hyaluronic acid-based materials injected superficially throughout the face to improve skin tone—have become popular offerings outside of the U.S. and are finding their way onto aesthetic message boards and review sites, generating significant interest among U.S.-based consumers.

Outside the states, physicians have access to specifically formulated products, such as Juvéderm Hydrate, Restylane Vital and Restylane Vital Light, as well as robust marketing campaigns to educate consumers on these new hydrating treatments.